Asian Review of Social Sciences (ARSS)
Dominations in Indian Sociology
Author : Mucheli Rishvanth ReddyVolume 9 No.2 July-December 2020 pp 36-39
Abstract
The growth trajectory of Indian Sociology in the past few decades is unsurpassed. From being treated as a ‘residual category’ and a subordinate disciple, it is now a well-developed and self-sustaining discipline. There are various demands placed on sociology after Independence which explicitly contributed to its development. But this development of Indian sociology is not free from certain dominations: (1) Domination of popular trends in sociology produced by western scholars, (2) Domination of certain sections in India, (3) Domination of State and Identity Politics. These domains of domination are significantly hindering the development of Indian sociology in an inclusive manner and degrading the efficacy of the knowledge produced in this field. The only way forward for Indian sociology is to develop indigenous sociological traditions, concepts, and methods to explain the social reality of India, to recognize the diverse trends of sociological knowledge being produced and promote civility, reason, and reflexivity among diverse perspectives of sociological knowledge.
Keywords
Indian Sociology, Western domination, Upper Castes, State Patronage
Full Text:
References
[1] Beteille, A. (1971). Caste, Class, and Power- Changing Patterns of Stratification in a Tanjore Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[2] Beteille, A. (1972, Aug). The Tribulations of Fieldwork. Economic and Political Weekly, 7(31/33), 1509-1516.
[3] Bottomore, T. B. (1962). Sociology in India. British Journal of Sociology, 13(2), 98-106.
[4] Damle, Y. B. (1974). Sociology in India: its teaching and status. International Social Science Journal, 26 (2), 343-348.
[5] Das, V. (1993, Jun 5). Sociological Research in India: The State of Crisis. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(23), 1159-1161.
[6] Desai, A. R. (1981, March). Relevance of the Marxist Approach to the study of Indian Society. Sociological Bulletin, 30(1), 1-20.
[7] Gardner, P. M. (1981, Feb). Review: The Fieldworker and the Field: Problems and Challenges in Sociological Investigation. by M. N. Srinivas, A. M. Shah and E. A. Ramaswamy. The Journal of Asian Studies, 40(2), 412-414.
[8] Kumar, V. (2016, June 18). How Egalitarian Is Indian Sociology? Economic and Political Weekly, 51(25), 33-39.
[9] Nayyar , D., Dholakia, B., & Parikh, K. S. (2011). Report of the Committee Constituted by the Government of India to Review the Functioning of ICSSR. New Delhi.
[10] Patel, S., & Harshe, R. (2003, Feb 8-14). Identity Politics and Crisis of Social Sciences. Economic and Political Weekly, 6.
[11] Rao, D. D. (2016). Study of Sociology in India: Some Deliberative Challenges. Retrieved June 29, 2020, from https://www.oiirj.org/oiirj/Articles-in-press2016/93.pdf