E-Learning Delivery Methods: Predictors of Satisfaction by Students of Nigerian Universities

Back to Journal

Home»Articles»E-Learning Delivery Methods: Predictors of Satisfaction by Students of Nigerian Universities

E-Learning Delivery Methods: Predictors of Satisfaction by Students of Nigerian Universities

Author : Janet O. Adekannbi
Volume 8 No.3 July-December 2019 pp 8-14

Abstract

Learners’ satisfaction is an important factor to the success of any e-learning programme. This study presents findings from students’ assessment of the e-learning platforms used at Distance Learning Centre University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Survey design was used. Data was collected from 351 students in 100 and 200 levels of the Centre using the questionnaire. Frequency and percentage distribution were used for descriptive statistics, while, multiple regression was performed to test the hypotheses. The results showed that Information quality, system quality and service quality were not significant predictors of student’s satisfaction except with the Email where information and service quality influenced overall satisfaction. Challenges to students’ use of the platforms include inadequate power supply, poor telecommunication network, high cost of self-provided power supply and high cost of owning and maintaining e-learning devices.

Keywords

E-learning Delivery Methods, Satisfaction, Distance Learning, Delone and Mclean IS Model

Full Text:

References

[1] Ajadi, T.O., Salawu, I.O. & Adeoye, F.A. (2008). E-learning and Distance Education in Nigeria. International Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 2-16.

[2] Ali, A. & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining students‟ satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Journal of Contemporary Educational Technology, 22(2), 118-134.

[3] Alreck, P.L. & Settle, R.B. (1995) The Survey Research Handbook, 2nd edition. Chicago:Irwin.

[4] Ayub, N. & Iqbal, S. (2011). Student satisfaction with e-Learning achieved in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 26-31.

[5] Delone, W.H. & Mclean, E.R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 50(2), 60–95.

[6] DeLone, W.H. & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

[7] Engelbrecht, E. (2005). Adapting to changing expectations: Postgraduate students‟ experience of an e-learning tax program. Computers and Education, 45(2), 217–229.

[8] Gay, L.R. & Diehl, P.L. (1992). Research Methods for Business and Management. New York:Macmillan.

[9] Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: What works and how? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12-18.

[10] Ilechukwu, L.C. (2013). The assessment of utilization of e-Learning opportunities for effective teaching and learning of religion in Nigerian tertiary institutions. European Journal of Educational Studies, 5(3), 343-359.

[11] Koivumaki, T., Ristola, A., & Kesti, M. (2008). The effects of information quality of mobile information services on user satisfaction and service acceptance–empirical evidence from Finland. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(5), 375-385.

[12] Kranzow, J. (2013). Faculty leadership in online education: Structuring courses to impact student satisfaction and persistence. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 131-139.

[13] Laumer, S., Maier, C., & Weitzel, T. (2017). Information quality, user satisfaction, and the manifestation of workarounds: A qualitative and quantitative study of enterprise content management system users. European Journal of Information Systems, 1-28. doi: 10.1057/s41303-016-0029-7

[14] Liaw, S.S. (2008). Investigating students‟ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-Learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.

[15] Machado-Da-Silva, F. N., Meirelles, F. D. S., Filenga, D., & Brugnolo F. M. (2014). Student satisfaction process in virtual learning system: Considerations based in information and service quality from Brazil‟s experience. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 122-142.

[16] Olatokun, W.M & Mala, A. (2011). Assessing students‟ satisfaction with an e-learning system: The case of National Open University of Nigeria. Africa Journal of Computer & ICTs, 5(4), 127-142.

[17] Olutola, T.A & Olatoye. O.O. (2015). Challenges of e-learning technologies in Nigeria University Education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(1), 301-305.

[18] Oye, M. S. (2011). Challenges of e-learning in Nigerian university education based on the experience of developed countries. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 3(2), 110-112.

[19] Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). The application of Google Classroom as a tool for teaching and learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 8(10), 5-8.

[20] Sun, P., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. & Yeh, D. (2007). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183-1202

[21] UNESCO (2011). UNESCO and Education. Geneva: UNESCO Retrieved from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ images/0021/002127/2127 15e.pdf (accessed 12 June 2017).