Impact of Total Quality Management Practices on Quality Performance: A Case Study on Armament Manufacturing Industry

Back to Journal

Home»Articles»Impact of Total Quality Management Practices on Quality Performance: A Case Study on Armament Manufacturing Industry

Impact of Total Quality Management Practices on Quality Performance: A Case Study on Armament Manufacturing Industry

Author : Hagos Berhane and Pramila Devi Maganti
Volume 7 No.2 July-December 2018 pp 58-63

Abstract

Total quality management (TQM) has been widely considered as the strategic, tactical and operational tool in the quality management research field. It is one of the most applied and well accepted approaches for business excellence besides continuous quality improvement, six sigma, just-in-time, and supply chain management approaches. This study investigated impact of TQM practices on quality performance in an armament manufacturing industry in Ethiopia. The quantitative approach and the survey method of collecting data were used. The five point Likert scale structured questionnaire was administered through the face-to-face method of collecting data. 340 questionnaires were randomly distributed to employees who are working in different factories in the two armament manufacturing industry. Eight factors related to TQM practices were initially selected as independent variables viz., leadership, customer focus, continuous improvement, employee involvement, training and education, supplier management, strategic quality planning, information analysis, and quality performance as dependent variable in the proposed model. Raw data was analysed with the help with SPSS software (version – 20). Mean, standard deviation, exploratory factor analyses, correlation, and multiple regression analyses were used to find the impact of TQM practices on quality performance. The results of this study supported the model proposed (R2 = 0.378, F = 36.292, p = 0.000). This study has shown that only three (viz., leadership, customer focus, and information analysis) of TQM practices significantly (p < 0.05) have positive impact on quality performance. It is recommended that industry should continue to implement TQM practices with all variables to improve quality performance. Industry should improve continuous improvement, employee involvement, training and education, supplier management, strategic quality planning more to overcome the barriers that prevent effective implementation of TQM practices.

Keywords

Total Quality Management, Quality Performance, Manufacturing Industry, Regression Analysis

Full Text:

References

[1] D.I. Prajogo and A.S. Sohal, “TQM and innovation: A literature review and research framework,” Technovation, Vol. 21, pp. 539-558, 2001.
[2] V. Arumugam, K.B. Ooi and T.C. Fong, “TQM practices and quality management performance-An investigation of their relationship using data from ISO 9001:2000 firms in Malaysia,” The TQM Magazine, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 636-650, 2008.
[3] I.D. Prajogo and S.A. Sohal, “The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 901-918, 2003.
[4] D.T. Hoang, B. Igel and T. Laosirihongthong, “The impact of total quality management on innovation: Findings from a developing country,” International Journal Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 23, No.9, pp. 1092-1117, 2006.
[5] S. Rahman, and P. Bullock, “Soft TQM hard TQM and organizational performance relationships: An empirical investigation,” Omega, Vol. 33, pp. 73-83, 2005.
[6] W.E. Deming, “Out of crisis,” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
[7] J.M. Juran, Juran on planning for quality, The Free Press, New York, 1988.
[8] P.B. Crosby, Quality is free: The art of making quality certain, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.
[9] A.V. Feigenbaum, Total quality control, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.
[10] J.V. Saraph, P.G. Benson, and R.G. Schroeder, “An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 810-829, 1989.
[11] D.I. Prajogo, and A.S. Sohal, “The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance,” The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 901-918, 2003.
[12] H. Kaynak, “The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance,” Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 21, pp. 405-435, 2003.
[13] N.P. Mielgo, J.M. Poen-Monters, and C.J. Ordas-Vazquez, “Are quality and innovation management conflicting activities?,” Technovation, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 537-545, 2009.
[14] D.I. Prajogo, A.S. Sohal, “The relationship between TQM practices and quality performance and the role of formal TQM programs: An Australian empirical study,” The Quality Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 4-31, 2004.
[15] Wilkinson, T. Redman, E. Snape, and M. Marchington, “Managing with Total Quality Management-Theory and Practice,” Macmillian Business, Basingstoke, 1998.
[16] E. Sadıkoğlu, and C. Zehir, “Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of
Turkish firms,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 127, No. 1, pp. 13-26, 2010.
[17] H.J. Cho and V. Pucik, “Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 555-575, 2005.
[18] D.C.K. Ho, V.G. Duck and H.M. Shih, “Total quality management: An empirical test for mediation effect,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 39, pp. 529-548, 2001.
[19] T.Y. Choi and K. Eboch, “The TQM paradox: Relations among TQM practices, plant performance, and customer satisfaction,” Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, pp. 59-75, 1998.
[20] E. Sadıkoğlu and C. Zehir, “The relationship between TQM practices and organizational performance: An empirical investigation,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 127, pp. 13-26, 2010.
[21] S. Rahman and P. Bullock, “Soft TQM hard TQM and organizational performance relationships: An empirical investigation,” Omega, Vol. 33, pp. 73-83, 2005.
[22] D.I. Prajogo and A. Brown, “The relationship between TQM practices and quality performance and the role of formal TQM programs: An Australian empirical study,” The Quality Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 31-42, 2004.
[23] E.E. Adam, M.L. Corbett and E.B. Flores, J.N. Harrison, T.S. Lee, T.S., B.H. Rho, J. Ribera, D. Samson, and R. Westbrook, “An international study of quality management approach and firm performance,” International Journal of Operations and
[24] I.D. Prajogo and S.A. Sohal, “Transitioning from total quality management to total innovation management: An Australian case,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 861-875, 2004.
[25] V. Arumugam, K.B. Ooi and T.C. Fong, “TQM practices and quality management performance- an investigation of their relationship using data from ISO 9001:2000 firms in Malaysia,” The TQM Magazine, Vol. 20, No.6, pp. 636-650, 2008.
[26] B.B. Flynn, R. Schroeder and S. Sakakibara, “A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument,” Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 11, pp. 339-366, 1994.
[27] B.B. Flynn, R. Schroeder and S. Sakakibara, “The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 659-692, 1995.
[28] D.I. Prajogo and A. Brown, “The relationship between TQM practices and quality performance and the role of formal TQM programs: An Australian empirical study,” Quality Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 31-43, 2004.
[29] Y.C. Jeng, “Performance evaluation of ISO 9000 registered companies in Taiwan,” The TQM Magazine, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 132-138, 1998.
[30] S.A. Brah and S.S.L. Tee, “Relationship between TQM and performance of Singapore companies,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 356-379, 2002.
[31] D.I. Prajogo, “The comparative analysis of TQM practices and quality performance between manufacturing and service firms,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 16, pp. 217-228, 2005.
[32] C. Sanchez-Rodriguez, F.W. Dewhurst and A.R. Martinez-Lorente, “IT use in supporting TQM initiatives: An empirical investigation,” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 26, pp. 486-504, 2006.
[33] S. Curkovic, S. Vickery and C. Droge, “Quality-related action programs: their impact on quality performance and firm performance,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 885–904, 2000.
[34] M.M.F. Fuentes, F.J.L. Montes and L.M. Fern´andez, “Total quality management, strategic orientation and organizational performance: the case of Spanish companies,” Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 303–323,2006.
[35] S.M. Lee, B.H. Rho and S.G. Lee, “Impact of Malcolm baldrige national quality award criteria on organizational quality performance,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 2003–2020, 2003.
[36] K.H. Lai, T.S. Weerakoon and T.C.E. Cheng, “The state of quality management implementation: a cross-sectional study of quality-oriented companies in Hong Kong,” Total Quality Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 29-38, 2002.
[37] D.I. Prajogo and S.W. Hong, “The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: a perspective from South Korean firms,” Technovation, Vol. 28, No. 12, pp. 855–863, 2008.
[38] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2nd edition, 1988.
[39] C. Zehir, Ö.G. Ertosun, S. Zehir and B. Müceldilli, “Total quality management practices’ effects on quality performance and innovative
performance,” International Conference on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 41, pp. 273-280, 2012.
[40] F. Talib, Z. Rahman and M.N. Qureshi, “The relationship between total quality management and quality performance in the service industry: A theoretical model,” International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 113-128, 2010.

Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology is a peer-reviewed International research journal aiming at promoting and publishing original high quality research in all disciplines of engineering and applied technology. All research articles submitted to AJEAT should be original in nature, never previously published in any journal or presented in a conference or undergoing such process across the world. All the submissions will be peer-reviewed by the panel of experts associated with particular field. Submitted papers should meet the internationally accepted criteria and manuscripts should follow the style of the journal for the purpose of both reviewing and editing.

AJEAT is covering all aspects of Engineering and Applied Technology areas. Topics include, but are not limited to:

Aerospace engineering Agricultural engineering Architectural engineering Bioengineering and biomedical engineering Chemical engineering Civil engineering Computer engineering Computer science and information science Electrical engineering and electronics engineering Environmental engineering	Industrial engineering Metallurgical engineering Ceramic engineering Materials science Metallurgy Mechanical engineering Nuclear engineering Petroleum engineering Plastics engineering and polymer science Textile & Fashion Technology

Total quality management (TQM) has been widely considered as the strategic, tactical and operational tool in the quality management research field. It is one of the most applied and well accepted approaches for business excellence besides continuous quality improvement, six sigma, just-in-time, and supply chain management approaches. This study investigated impact of TQM practices on quality performance in an armament manufacturing industry in Ethiopia. The quantitative approach and the survey method of collecting data were used. The five point Likert scale structured questionnaire was administered through the face-to-face method of collecting data. 340 questionnaires were randomly distributed to employees who are working in different factories in the two armament manufacturing industry. Eight factors related to TQM practices were initially selected as independent variables viz., leadership, customer focus, continuous improvement, employee involvement, training and education, supplier management, strategic quality planning, information analysis, and quality performance as dependent variable in the proposed model. Raw data was analysed with the help with SPSS software (version - 20). Mean, standard deviation, exploratory factor analyses, correlation, and multiple regression analyses were used to find the impact of TQM practices on quality performance. The results of this study supported the model proposed (R2 = 0.378, F = 36.292, p = 0.000). This study has shown that only three (viz., leadership, customer focus, and information analysis) of TQM practices significantly (p < 0.05) have positive impact on quality performance. It is recommended that industry should continue to implement TQM practices with all variables to improve quality performance. Industry should improve continuous improvement, employee involvement, training and education, supplier management, strategic quality planning more to overcome the barriers that prevent effective implementation of TQM practices.