The Asian Review of Civil Engineering (TARCE)
Investigation on Behaviour of Cold-Formed Ferritic Stainless Steel Hollow Beams
Author : M. Nilakanmani and M. AnbarasuVolume 7 No.2 July-December 2018 pp 34-38
Abstract
This work deals with the investigation on the behavior of cold-formed ferritic stainless steel hollow beams. The numerical model was developed by using Finite Element (FE) software ABAQUS [1]. The developed FE model includes material non-linearity, geometric non-linearity and geometric imperfections. The numerical model is validated by comparison of experimental results reported by Afshan and Gardner (2013) [2]. The sections for parametric study were selected based on the EN-1993-1-4 specifications [8]. The key parameters varied in the study were material properties, section geometry and thickness of the section. The parametric study has been carried out by using the verified FE model and the results were compared with the flexural resistance predicted by the Direct Strength Method (DSM) [3]. Based on the comparison of results the effect of geometric parameters on the cold-formed ferritic stainless steel hollow beams are discussed and based on the comparison of results the possible conclusions are drawn.
Keywords
Abaqus, Beams, Direct Strength Method, Ferritic Stainless Steel, Hollow Section
Full Text:
References
[1] ABAQUS, Dassault Systems Simulia Corp, ABAQUS Standard User’s Manual Version 6.13, USA, 2013.
[2] S. Afshan and L. Gardner, “Experimental Study of Cold-Formed Ferritic Stainless Steel Hollow Sections”, 10.1061/ (ASCE) ST.1943-541X.0000580, 2013.
[3] AISI-S100:2012, North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members specification, Washington, DC, USA.
[4] I. Arrayago and E. Real, “Experimental study on ferritic stainless steel simply supported and continuous beams”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 119, pp. 50-62, 2016.
[5] M. Bock, I. Arrayago and E. Real, “Experiments on cold-formed ferritic stainless steel slender sections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 109, 13-23, 2015.
[6] M. Bock, L. Gardner and E. Real, “Material and local buckling response of ferritic stainless steel sections”, Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 89, 131-141, 2014.
[7] EN 1993-1-3, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – Part 1-3: General rules – Supplementary rules for cold-formed members and sheeting, 2006.
[8] EN 1993-1-4, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – Part 1-4: General rules – Supplementary rules for stainless steels, 2006.
[9] L. Gardner and M. Theofanous, “Discrete and continuous treatment of local buckling in stainless steel elements”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 64, No. 11, pp. 1207-1216, 2008.
[10] Y. Huang and B. Young, “Experimental and numerical investigation of cold-formed lean duplex stainless steel flexural members”, Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 73, pp. 216-228, 2013.
[11] S. Niu, K. J. R. Rasmussen and F. Fan, “Distortional-global interaction buckling of stainless steel C-beams: Part I: Experimental investigation”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 96, pp. 127-139, 2014.
[12] S. Niu, K. J. R. Rasmussen and F. Fan, “Distortional-global interaction buckling of stainless steel C-beams: Part II: Numerical study and design”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 96, pp. 40-53, 2014.
[13] J. K. Sonu and D. K. Singh, “Shear characteristics of Lean Duplex Stainless Steel (LDSS) rectangular hollow beams structures”, Vol. 10, pp. 13-29, 2017.
[14] Z. Tao and K. J. R. Rasmussen, “Stress-Strain Model for Ferritic Stainless Steels”, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 28, No. 2, 06015009, pp. 1-5, 2016.
[15] M. Theofanous and L. Gardner, “Experimental and numerical studies of lean duplex stainless steel beams”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 66, pp. 816-825, 2010.